This is a shot Lili, Szóda, Dió, and me on the
We’ve been back for over a week now. School’s started up, and I’m teaching two classes of seventeen. Twelve different countries represented in the classroom, and a theme of inter-cultural exchange in the Writing Skills course. It makes for an interesting day at work.
Dóra’s folks are here in
I’m fairly certain our exposure is not as overwhelming as it is for those in the States, but it is exhausting none-the-less.
Exhausting for two reasons:
First, people actively seek out my opinion because I’m actually able to vote.
Second, and certainly the more exhausting reason, the European view of American politics is so skewed that I’m often asked to re-explain the issues I'm concerned about. "You mean it about more than just race?"
I’m not saying I live in a vacuum or that I am the only expert over here. I have friends at work who are more up-to-date on this than I am.
Then there’s Dóra, her folks, and the e-news all keeping me humble. But the repeated experience of breaking down my views for people who are unfamiliar with
Warning! This post will now address politics!
I’ve been politically-minded for years now, and my opinions are important to me. However, I’ve always done my best to hear out and weigh the arguments of those who disagree with me. Not only is this the polite approach, it also allows me to shift my stance if I come across hard evidence that runs counter to my opinions. I don’t think such a maneuver signals weakness, but strength.
You see, I have close friends and family who sharply disagree with my politics. I respect the intelligence and opinions of these people. And in deference to them, I try to keep an open mind on the issues. When they are correct, I’ve learned to swallow my pride and accept their take.
But then yesterday I experienced something for the very first time. I was explaining my choice for president to yet another European who thought a white person was more qualified to be president than a black person (he didn’t seem to care about who the candidates were). I was halfway through my bare-bones explanation of the issues when I experienced – for the first time – absolute certainty and complete clarity.
It was mind-blowing. For the first time in my life, I realized that nothing could change my opinion: The Republican Party as it exists today cannot run the executive branch of the US Federal Government.
I think I reached the tipping point when I started describing the FDA’s inability to contain the Salmonella outbreaks, but it might have been when I got through summarizing the complete lack of oversight on Federally-insured loans.
Whatever it was…
Funding a war with borrowed money,
Failing to maintain basic infrastructure,
Allowing speculation to drive up the cost of oil,
Bailing out buddies at a private investment firm with taxpayer dollars (which creates expectations from other firms that want the same kind of treatment) despite the Party’s hard line against government interference in the private sector,
Expanding the powers and size of the central government despite the party’s claim to favor small government…
…I cannot think of any reason someone would vote for the Republicans. The blunders I listed are not Bush blunders. He may have taken us to a war on false intelligence. He may have over-politicized the judicial branch. He may have made more mistakes than that. He’s administration has stumbled, sure. But the Republican Party’s arbitrarily enforced small-government policies are responsible for too many of
I will remain registered an independent and keep an open mind on other matters. But this issue is closed for me. You can like or dislike McCain. You can feel energized or deflated by whoever that disaster of a VP nominee is. You can say Obama is the president we need, or completely un-presidential. But you cannot get me to believe that the Republican Party is capable of wielding executive power at the Federal level in its current state.
Finally, please check out my brother Myles's music store. He's quite good, and by quite good, I mean excellent. But you don't have to take my word for it...
6 comments:
Um, that is a pretty broad statement. There are certainly individuals within the R party who are in line with your views and are equally frustrated with the same issues.
Remember, the D party has been in control for a while now, other than Bush, and has done virtually nothing.
Both parties suck, which is why it is important for us to focus on individual candidates, regardless of party, even if they are R, and get the best people elected.
"...the D party has been in control for a while now..."
The Dems have been in control of the legislative branch, not the executive.
My examples all come out of the executive branch:
The deregulation of lending + the Bear Sterns 'bailout' were treasury dept. decisions.
The appointment of officials in charge of federal infrastructure comes from various departments within the executive branch.
The FDA is overseen by a cabinet member, health and human services.
As far as fail war-funding policy goes:
The party doesn't want to stop funding these wars, but it claims it won't raise taxes. So we keep borrowing. Which in turn leads us to more weak-dollar policy.
The only point you might have me on is the small government thing. There are powerful republicans that want to reduce the size of the government. But after Huckabee's populist message hit home in the primaries, I haven't heard much noise on that front.
So while you may be right (both parties do suck), the republican policies have actually damaged the country significantly. My tax dollars are going to pay for all the mistakes I've listed, and the longer we allow such mistakes to persist, the more I'm going to have to pay. Get them out of the executive's seat.
I wish I were both more knowledgeable and more eloquent when it comes to politics. I also try to keep an open mind, but I'm still shocked that we reelected W. I feel something like genuine fear that we are going to end up with another republican in charge. I do respect McCain, which is more than I can say for Bush at this point, but I don't want him to be president.
thanks hogan, thank you for thinking through this stuff and posting it. it shows i have a long way to go with my deeper/clearer understanding of some important issues. also i was just with my family for a couple days and my dad and i got at each others throats over politics. my brother in law and i were surprisingly friendly though which was nice. but man old man herzing and i went at it. my mom broke up the "fighting" twice. she was so nice about it, coming to my defence, telling my dad to hear me out, saying she wasn't completely sure who she was going to vote for yet. i hate that my dad and i can't really have a positive conversation involving politics, we take the issues WAY too personally. like father like son i guess to a T.
News Story
I'm sure glad the Treasury Dept bailed out Bear Stearns. I', sure that prevented other investments firms from suffering the same fate. Say, how're your Lehman Brothers shares doing?
Clarity equals those crazy, chaos and anarchy libertarians. ::grin::
Post a Comment