I presented the below on day one of the conference. Aside from some AV hiccups, the session went very well.
The research is from my dissertation and it sums up the portion I'm currently writing up for an artilce I aim to submit to the WAC Journal.
The bit of knowledge I'm trying to introduce to the discourse is the concept of "dynamic transfer." It shows up about half way through the presentation where I shared a graph and table from the Martin and Schwartz chapter that describes dynamic transfer.
The graph is an adaptation of a learning model from artificial intelligence, and I think that's fun, but I also think the graph shows a number of learning trajectories that helped me understand learning to writing in new spaces.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ff99/5ff994309c5ef98377d6500633300d13cf8c5793" alt=""
I know that dip well. I've experienced it and I've seen it in my students.
I like that dynamic transfer adds some important detail to the mechanics of high road transfer - it goes into what happens when students "detect, elect, and connect" with prior knowledge.
I attended three panels (on the program D3, F1, H3, I1) that I felt this idea could inform. I was able to speak with Liane Robertson about this, and the discussion did a lot to deepen my understanding of transfer as a whole.
The conference was a great experience, and I look forward to unpacking all I learned.
No comments:
Post a Comment